![]() “While the aforementioned rolling train was attended,” FRA reported, “it nevertheless engaged in an unintended movement.”īased on FRA’s review of the June 22, 2022, incident and “its awareness of other train incidents involving an unintended air brake release under similar circumstances,” it is making the following four recommendations: The initiation of the brake release would enable the accelerated release functionality by taking some air from the emergency brake reservoirs and directing it back into the brake pipe resulting in a substantial number of adjacent car brakes releasing.” FRA reported that “otentially contributing factors causing the train’s unintended movement included the downhill grade, wet rail and the train’s tonnage.”įRA noted that due to the potential for air brake system leaks, it prohibits unattended trains from depending solely on air brakes to hold equipment. The crew then contacted the dispatcher and railroad management to report the unintended brake release and the conductor set a sufficient number of car handbrakes to hold the train on the grade.”įRA reported that its investigation of the rolling train’s event recorder, positive train control (PTC) system and engine data logs revealed “the PTC system had operated properly and would have initiated an emergency brake application upon reaching the signal the Trip Optimizer was off and the lead locomotive and consist did not cause the unintended brake release.” Instead, FRA determined that, “after approximately three hours with the air brakes set, the air pressure slowly bled down from some of the cars’ auxiliary reservoirs, likely causing localized brake releases. The conductor operated the emergency brake valve and stopped the train short of the signal and the train that was preparing to cross through the interlocking. The locomotive engineer of the rolling train applied full-service airbrakes and full dynamic braking but was not satisfied that the brakes were working effectively or fast enough. The locomotive consist’s independent brakes remained fully applied but due to the grade, tonnage and wet rail could not solely hold the train without the automatic air brakes also being applied.”Īccording to FRA, “t the time an opposing train on the same track was preparing to cross through the interlocking in front of the rolling train. This train experienced an unintended automatic brake release. After being stopped for approximately three hours, the engineer and conductor, located in the lead locomotive cab, observed the train roll toward the signal interlocking displaying a stop indication. The engineer stopped the train on a downhill grade of 0.9-1.18% near the signal governing the train’s movement, set the train’s air brakes at approximately 12 pounds, and fully set the locomotive consist’s independent brakes. The agency reported that “during a significant thunderstorm, a crew consisting of a locomotive engineer and conductor operated a conventionally powered, intermodal train with three head-end locomotives, 47 loaded cars, and six empty cars, totaling 9,204 feet in length and 7,392 tons in weight. 29 issued a safety advisory to make the rail industry aware “of a recent issue encountered by a train crew that experienced an unintended brake release of a train’s automatic air brakes while stopped at a signal,” and to recommend four steps to address the unintended release of train air brakes.įRA published Safety Advisory 2022-02 (download below) in the Federal Register following its review of a Jincident. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) on Dec. Talgo Series 6 Bistro Car Donated to Northwest Railway Museum.CHSRA Releases 2022 Project Update Report. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |